Paragraph 36
Discretion of Tribunals or Court if no replyWhere the respondent has not entered an appearance, or has not filed his reply within the prescribed time or within such time as the Tribunal or Court may have allowed, or has given notice that he does not intend to oppose the petition, then if—
(a) there remains no more than one other candidate in the election who was not returned;
(b) the election petition contains no prayer for a determination that the election was void;
(c) there are no facts or grounds stated in the election petition or in the reply, if any, or stated in any further particulars filed in the proceedings or otherwise appearing on proof of which it ought to be determined that election was void; or
(d) the election petition is one complaining of undue return and claiming the seat or office for the candidate who was not returned and the respondent has not raised any formal or written objections to any of the votes relied on by the petitioner, the Tribunal or Court may, if it deems fit, determine the proceedings on the election petition without hearing evidence or further evidence, and in any case, the proceedings shall be continued and determined on such evidence or otherwise as the Tribunal or Court may deem necessary for the full and proper determination of the election petition.
This paragraph empowers the Tribunal or Court to either determine the Petition without
necessarily going into full hearing or continue with the proceedings and determine the
Petition
based on the evidence presented, as the case may be.
Read Augustine & Anor v. Apugo & Ors (2019) LPELR-48822(CA)